Thursday, April 2, 2026

No One’s Minding the Store

  • I was absent from my teaching job the first 1/3 of the last school year This was because of what is called recovery. That was preceded by treatment, which took up a perfect 100% of my vaunted teacher’s summer. All this was in response to cancer, but cancer itself goes in a different box. My journey was all about treatment and recovery.

     

    Incidentally, whereas treatment coincided with my summer, recovery aligned as perfectly with my store of 20 years’ of accrued substitute days. One could not ask for a smaller economic impact of illness.

     

    Besides discomfort, an absolutely Olympic course of nausea, and losing 1/4 of my previous weight (sure am glad I was a bit plump going into this!), my worst enemy was depression.

     

    All I could do about this was to take up walking as a main activity, but to do this, you first must get off the couch. There is no other way. One time, while discussing this, all I had to do was leave the couch to go to bed, and that first step was difficult. Asked about my dysphoria, I responded (and a critical and loving family member quoted me on this later in a rather Eeyore tone of voice), “I just want to get back to where I’m supposed to be.” At work. Teaching school.

     

    When I did get back, I hit the ground running, though the schedule of the train I take and my cautious regard for my physical stamina had me practically working to rule. Working to rule is a labor tactic, on the low end of the spectrum opposite striking at the upper end. This is where teachers arrive at school at the time their official working day begins and leave when it ends. It’s a bit passive-aggressive, though one teacher I knew did it for their mental health. It works on the idea that one can hardly be expected to do this job in 7 hours a day. Alternatively, it forces one to get tasks done during the 4 hours per week of  “prep time” allotted,  or at recess and lunch. As with studying while working it forces one to manage time well.

    I arrived 30 minutes before work hours (if the train ran on time!) and left 15 minutes after work hours ended.

     

    I respected my abilities and limitations. It cost me, but it did not exceed those limitations. There was a certain amount of napping on the train home.

     

    I salvaged what I viewed as the chaos various long term substitutes had left lacking, as they did, any kind of direction from me. I restructured the physical, procedural, and cultural classroom. By the way, we have rules about substitute teachers. It is actually prohibited for one sub to teach more than 30 days straight, I think it is. I was out about 60!

     

    Substitute teachers are prone to bring with them ideas more oriented to rote learning, more fill-in-the-blank, do the homework assignment kinds of teaching. I strive to make learning constructive, that is, I seek for the student to construct their own meaning about what we are learning. This is not easy.

     

    Add to this that the school year effectively ends in April, at about 5/6 of the way through the school year calendar. This is because standardized testing begins then. Students must know everything applicable to their grade by then. They spend 4 out of 5 mornings per week for 5 weeks straight taking these tests on computers. Third grade, which I teach, is the first time these students experience these tests. So, the heat was on. I think I did OK, and the results of those tests seem to corroborate that perception.


    Last month, one of the teachers with whom I work most closely, and with whom I enjoy chatting, mentioned in passing that our principal thought highly of the way I handled my return. I suppose he’s seen a number of those returns. Not everyone has the underlying physical strength I have, and there have been some difficult returns that even I noted as an uninvolved observer. I could tell you stories.

     

    The principal did not give the praise to me, but I heard it second hand a year later. In our business, giving praise is a crucial tool. If little Jimmy manages to pick up his pencil the tight way ‘round after a morning of acting like a toddler (this is no exaggeration for the 3rd grader I am thinking of), then, boy, you really speak up and praise him for that one little thing he did right! It’s a dereliction on the part of the principal not to have told me. Thing is, I am not upset at him for this.

     

    Yes, the praise taken second hand, after the fact does make me the tiniest bit moist around the eyes, here’s what it made me realize: my motivation, my regulation, my praise, my criticism, all of this, it comes from me. I own it, I manage it, I’m responsible for it. Yes, this can be toxic if I am corrupted, lose perspective, or suffer from hypocrisy, but there you go.

     

    I’m minding the store.

  • Friday, December 26, 2025

    Joke

    Guy shows up for his first day at work at the local soil ‘n’ aggregate yard. They got these trucks comin’ in an he’s gotta tell em where to go.
    He labels the truckloads as they come in. You gotcher humus, yer gravel, your potting soil.
    It’s easy, says Manny, showin’ him the ropes. Truck comes in, you check the paperwork. Chalk up on the hopper where it’s headed. Got it? 
    Guy says “Yeah, I got this boss. Rest assured.” Manny says, “Great, and keep an eye out for the gravel. We got enough o’ the ordinary soil and need to build inventory in aggregate. I’ll see you around lunch.”
    First load comes in marked down for loam. After that, aside from one hopper filled with beach sand around 10:30, one load after another goes straight to loam. He’s on top of it, marking each bin “loam”, until finally there’s a line of idling diesels waiting to offload, all at the same bay.
    About this time, Manny comes back, humoring the trainee, but clearly a bit steamed to see the trucks all cued up.
    “Ok, so I see you’ve been workin’ the incoming shipments, but I need to know why my yard is all jammed up.”
    “I can’t help it boss! Look right here in my manifest! All loads read ‘to loam’”


     

    Horror vs. Real Life

    Horror movies: blood sucking vampires. Horror IRL: money sucking vampires.
     
    Horror movies: scientist who builds a man from corpses. Horror IRL: scientists build a bomb to incinerate 10s of 1,000s of humans.
     
    Horror movies: invisible spirits of dead people hurt you and you can do nothing against them. Horror IRL: the invisible state hurts you and you can do nothing against it.
     
    Horror movies: witches. Horror IRL: fucking priests*. 'Nuff said.
     
    Horror movies: zombies rise up. Horror IRL: the poor rise up. 
    Folks, you gotta ask yourself if you are a zombie, that is to say, if you are really that worried that the poor ' gonna take away your Mustang, or if you are, in fact, the poor.
     
    Horror IRL: Egyptian nobility who should be dead walk around doing whatever it is they do. Horror IRL: modern nobility** hoard billions of dollars. 
     
    Horror movies: various creatures who come out of swamps or ocean depths. Horror IRL: marines. Sorry, but, hey, you know.
     
    Horror movies: aliens from Mars who abduct, study, enslave, dissect and exterminate you. Horror IRL: aliens from Europe, ditto.
     
    Horror movies: radioactive monster comes put of the sea to incinerate cities. Horror IRL: submarines rise out of sea to incinerate cities.
     
    Horror movie: huge machines rampage across cities. Horror IRL: huge SUVs rampage across cities.
     
    *nondenominational anthropological usage. 
    **remind me about the weird thing we do w the word “noble”. Have y’all in fact read ANY history?? 

    Cammies

    Age 9: decide to wear "army clothes" whenever possible.

    Age 13: join cadet group: wear suckass fatigues. Plot to improve situation.

    Age 16: continue to wear various suckass green fatigues b/c cargo pants uniforms unavailable.

     Become familiar with genuine tigerstripe cammies my friend Brian has somehow acquired.

    Age 18: spend entire life savings on crummy post-Vietname War commercial tigerstripe fatigues: 40 bucks.

    Age 20: get groovy German cammies, arcane Desert Night cammies, wear all over Europe. 

    Tell GF that I have decided to try to acquire every camouflage pattern in the world. 

    She replies that I would then have exactly 2 patterns. Relationship does not last.

    Age 24 or so: decide to finally get serious about camo. Cover office/guest room with camo jackets 

    on cardboard to display their pattern, make camo director’s chair seats. Mix camo jackets with jeans.

    Age 30 or so: transition from camo jackets to camo pants, mix with plaid shirts [Pendletons!] 

    Focus on few, cool patterns.

    Age 35 or so: own approximately 7 camouflage patterns. 

    Age 40 or so: get multiple patterns in order to ease wear on few patterns, extend usefulness.

    Age 50 or so: discover that exotic patterned fabric is much easier to find than exotic patterned pants that fit. 

    Begin making pants. Start a Facebook page called Bad Camo, chronicling camo that is silly, stupid, and fascinating.

    Age 55 or so: reach point that I can go an entire summer off from the school year wearing a different 

    pattern each day.

    Age 58: own 7 different Vietnam Tigerstripe patterned pants alone. See Age 35 or so. 

    Age 60 or so: realize that by any objective metric, I have far too many pairs of camo pants.

    Age 62: realize that I have be a much more stylish fucker wearing non-camouflage pants. 

    The too much camo remains.


     

    Marriage

     

    You must marry ___ so your father can become more powerful.
    You are not allowed to marry ___ because your parents say no.
    You made the mistake of marrying ___ without permission, so the king shall punish you.
    You made the mistake of marrying someone not for rational motivations, but for the absurdity of love, so we shall think ill of you.
    You must marry ___ so they can acquire half your lands.
    You married someone with a different imaginary friend, so your imaginary friend shall no longer allow you to imagine that you are playing with them.
    You married someone who talks to their imaginary friend differently than you, so same consequence.
    You married someone whose imaginary friend we take exception to, so we shall not allow your corpse to be buried over here, but only over there.
    You married someone who looks funny, so we shall hang you, or them, from a nearby tree.
    You married someone who used to be married to someone else, so kitty bar the fuckin' door!
    You didn't travel to this place here just to marry someone did you? No, of course not. That would be naughty. 
    You don't want to get married to someone just so we will let you stay over here rather than over there, would you? That would be the height of cynicism!
    You're getting married? Well, of course, their mother gets to choose the silverware and the menu. I thought you knew that!!
    You got married? Good. We shall now title you so that everyone else immediately knows your status. Unless you're a man.
    You got married? Good. We shall now call you Missus John Smith.
    You got married? Simply everybody wears a silly little ring, so we expect you shall as well. Weren't you told that?
    How lovely that you got married? Now, dutifully go 'round to every bureaucratic office you can and deface your surname.
    Thank you for getting married. You shall now peep out from every genealogical survey 2 centuries now as merely "Peggy", with no other data assigned to you except who you gave birth to.
    You got married? Lovely! We would like to know all about it. Here, pee in this cup. Give us some blood. Let us swab your cheek.
    You will, naturally, need to be licensed to get married, just as you would to drive a car. Yes, of course, there is a fee! Congratulations!
    No, you can't possibly have got married. You have an innie/outie, and they've got an innie/outie, too!
    You're getting married? That's disgusting! To hell with your cake!

    Highly Advanced Motorcycle Hipster

     

    I’m trying to figure out who this guy is. He's on a knucklehead (or panhead?) Harley, a flatly unpretentious, stripped down machine that looks at home in about 1970, but whose engine hails from 2 or 3 decades earlier. Its breathy exhaust note appears to stem from the fact that its exhaust pipe- not muffler- is simply pinched shut in a linear gap. It is not terribly loud, not ridden to be loud. It idles great.
     
    Rider is about 35, maybe Latino. There is little to set him apart from any given crowd. Worn, dusty gear, ball cap under half helmet, rolled up jeans, boots for work, not for appearances.
     
    So who is this guy? A dedicated motorcyclist who keeps this grimy treasure in running, "live" condition for Sunday rides around town? Hipster scum living out the biker dream of my-not his- generation? Actual biker? Mechanical whiz with a love for the old stuff?
     
    He pulls away ahead of traffic, the engine no more than loping. Pulls in the clutch, engine at idle, reaches down to the left below his seat and JERKS THE SHIFTER INTO THE NEXT GEAR. This, then, is the infamous "suicide clutch", foot actuated, meaning you can't put that foot down at a stoplight without dropping into gear. A number of you may remember Fat Freddie of Fantastic Furry Freak Brothers comics having a misadventure with this, falling right over on the unsupported clutch foot side, saying, as I recall, "Oh, no, oh, no, oh, no!" on his way down, the choices being between falling over and suddenly thrusting out into traffic.
     
    One more detail. That rolled-up pant-leg? Selvedge denim. That's one pretty danged advanced hipster.

    On the Black Block, February, 2017

     

    I have a limited familiarity with the black block phenomenon. Many lack even this basic familiarity. Here is what I saw on Wednesday before the demonstration against the fascist provocateur and paedophile who tried to speak on the UC Berkeley campus:
     
    As I stopped on Southside for a tasty vegan snack, there was a small group doing the same. They were a nondescript group-- 2 young white men, one young brown woman, one skateboard. It was notable that they were wearing all black, with black caps and zipped up black jackets. Their shoes were interesting: 2 of 3 wore nylon/leather black boots, same as many law enforcement people. I did not look at them too intently, preferring to leave them some privacy. One, though, wore a body camera on his backpack strap, so they wore backpacks. I assume they also were black.
     
    What they did not have is any sort of law enforcement or skinhead vibe or iconography. They also lacked any other sort of vibe.
     
    On their own, they might have been just another knot of hipsters, but as i walked north on telegraph, I noticed more small knots of 3, similarly attired. There was a mix of genders. There was nothing at all flashy about them. There were some nonwhites, but no Black folks. They may have had any sort of philosophy at all in their minds, but no right wing ideation was apparent. They rapidly coalesced, pulled bandanas over their faces and threw up barricades completely blocking Bancroft with about 30 people working together. 
     
    I saw no apparent right-wing action. I saw apparent anarchist coalescence, work and action. I did not see the people at the center of the crowd at Pauley Ballroom. There were fireworks including large firecrackers. These may have been different folks, though it seems a safe bet that they were the same folks.